A massive new public art installation in downtown Lexington has become the center of heated community discussion following its official dedication. The sculpture, titled "A Common Thread," cost the city $900,000 and represents the largest piece of artwork ever commissioned by Lexington, created specifically to celebrate the city's upcoming 250th birthday.
The towering installation has been under construction near the Fayette County Courthouse for several months, drawing curious glances from passersby. City officials proudly dedicated the sculpture on Wednesday, with Mayor Linda Gorton emphasizing its significance to the community. "A Common Thread represents a significant commitment to public art here in Lexington," Gorton stated during the dedication ceremony.
The artwork was designed and created by Benjamin Ball, a California-based artist who was selected for this high-profile project. Ball explained the deeper symbolism behind his creation, describing it as more than just a visual spectacle. "The work is a loom for shared identity. A place where past and future are held together by A Common Thread," Ball said, referring to the sculpture's intended representation of community unity and historical continuity.
Community reactions to the installation have been notably mixed, with residents expressing a wide range of opinions about both the artwork's aesthetic appeal and its substantial price tag. Some residents have embraced the modern addition to their downtown landscape. "I think it's nice," said one local resident when asked for their opinion. Another observer appreciated its contemporary style, noting, "It's an interesting, more modern art piece. I think that art is subjective." A third resident commented, "I think it's a little abstract but I really enjoy it."
However, not all feedback has been positive, with some residents struggling to connect with the sculpture's abstract design. One critic described their impression by saying, "It kind of looks like a necklace tangled up and twisted," highlighting the subjective nature of public art appreciation.
Local artist Cassandra Vogl has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of the project, raising concerns about both the selection process and financial implications. Her primary objection centers on the decision to hire an out-of-state artist when local talent was readily available. "I would've loved to see an art piece that was Kentucky designed and Kentucky made. We have a lot of talent here in Lexington and throughout the Bluegrass and I would have really loved to see them highlighted," Vogl explained.
The $900,000 price tag has also drawn significant criticism from Vogl and other community members who question the use of public funds for such an expensive project. "That's a lot. You know, when that's coming from public funds I'd like to see public input at a price tag that high," Vogl said, expressing concern about the lack of community consultation on such a substantial expenditure. She added with a touch of sarcasm, "You can't put a price tag on art, but apparently you can!"
Despite the criticism, some residents have defended both the artistic choice and the financial investment. Kevin Jenkins, a local resident, offered a more pragmatic perspective on the costs involved. "Art costs a lot so the price tag doesn't bug me. With art, it's always nice when it's local but to be honest it's about what can make the best thing for this city? Is that a local person, a national person, an international person? I think it's okay that it can be any of those things," Jenkins stated.
The sculpture project received unanimous approval from the city council during the summer months, indicating strong official support for the initiative despite the current public debate. The timing of the installation and dedication coincides with preparations for Lexington's significant milestone anniversary, making it a centerpiece of the city's celebratory efforts. As the community continues to adjust to this major addition to their downtown landscape, the sculpture serves as both a symbol of civic pride and a reminder of the subjective nature of public art appreciation.
